Visualisation(s): 4205 (7 ULg)
Téléchargement(s): 0 (0 ULg)
Visualisation(s): 4484 (20 ULg)
Téléchargement(s): 0 (0 ULg)
Some suitable grasses and legumes for ley pastures in Sudanian Africa: the case of the Borgou region in Benin
Notes de la rédaction
Received on January 4, 2008, accepted on March 18, 2008
Graminées et légumineuses adaptées à la jachère fourragère des régions soudaniennes de l'Afrique de l'Ouest : le cas du Borgou au Bénin. Dans la région soudanienne de l'Afrique, les systèmes de production agricole sont sous pression en raison de l'augmentation de la population humaine et animale, des changements climatiques, des modes extensifs de production agricole, de la chute des coûts des produits d'exportation, etc. Les possibilités d'intensification des systèmes de production agricole dans le Borgou au Bénin sont limitées notamment à cause des faibles capacités d'investissement financier des paysans. Par conséquent, les communautés rurales comptent sur des technologies relativement peu coûteuses pour accroître les productions et assurer l'alimentation des animaux. Les cultures fourragères sont des aliments de bonne qualité en comparaison avec les jachères naturelles. Leur intégration dans les systèmes de production sous forme de jachère fourragère offre des possibilités d'augmenter non seulement les disponibilités alimentaires du bétail mais aussi d'accroître la fertilité des sols. Ce document présente une gamme de graminées et de légumineuses susceptibles d'être utilisées en jachère fourragère, mettant l'accent sur les forces et faiblesses de ces espèces en termes d'adaptation au climat, de leur production fourragère, de leur valeur alimentaire et de la restauration de la fertilité des sols. Le choix d'une ou de plusieurs de ces espèces pour les utiliser en mono-culture ou en mélange sous forme de jachère fourragère doit être fait avec précaution en tenant compte des avantages et inconvénients de ces espèces, de la capacité financière des paysans et de leur adaptation à l'environnement local.
In Sudanian region of Africa, agricultural systems are under increasing pressure because of human and animal population growth, climate changes, extensive practises, decreasing prices for cash crops, etc. Possibilities of intensification in smallholder farming systems of the Borgou region in Benin are limited due to difficulties to pay for external inputs. Therefore, rural communities rely heavily on low input technologies to increase crop production and animal feed. Cultivated forages are of better-feed quality for ruminants compared to weed fallows. Their integration in cropping system through ley pastures has the potential to increase not only animal feed availability but also to improve soil fertility. This paper reviews some possible grass and legume species that can be used for that purpose with a special focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the species in terms of soil and climate suitability, forage production, nutritive value and soil fertility restoration. The choice of one or several among them as leys in pure stands or mixed forage crops must be taken carefully considering the balance between advantages and disadvantages of the species, the available financial and technical inputs and the adaptation to the local environment.
Table des matières
1In Sudanian regions such as the Borgou region in Benin, land cropping is practised by small-farmers according to the traditional method of slash-and-burn cultivation. The fields are cropped for 3 to 4 years and, afterwards, the land is left in a weed fallow with many unpalatable species (Nye et al., 1960). Originally, the fallow duration ranged from 10 to 20 years in the Borgou (Floret et al., 1999), while in other Sudanian zones of West Africa fallow periods up to 30 years are reported (Klein et al., 1999; Somé et al., 2007). Today, the increased population densities and the development of cash crops have drastically reduced land availability, leading to a net reduction of the fallow period with dramatic consequences on soil fertility (Mapongmetsem, 1999; Rethman, 2000; Koutika et al., 2002; Nikiema, 2005).
2On another hand, livestock owners in their search for ruminant feeds intensively overexploit the natural vegetation as well as the weed fallows, and the availability of the natural forage has currently become the main constraint to ruminant production (Peters et al., 2003; Carr et al., 2005). This is especially the case during the dry season when the low nutritive value of forages induces loss of ruminants body weight, reduces milk production and increases calf mortality as well as nutritional anoestrus (McIntire et al., 1992; Gbangboché, 2005).
3This conjunction of over-cultivation and grazing has gradually led to depletion of soil fertility, deterioration of its structure, increased erosion, lower biological activity and higher incidence of crop diseases and pests (Dalal et al., 1986; 1991). There is an urgent need to adopt fertility restorative practices to maintain the sustainability of the farming and livestock systems.
4Opportunities for intensification in smallholder farming systems in Borgou, like in other extensive systems, are however limited due to difficulties to pay for external inputs. Ley pasture integrated in farming systems can produce synergistic effects with minimal inputs (Humphreys, 1994; Peters et al., 2001; Clem, 2004). The versatility of forages allows them to be used in different ways in the complex production systems of the tropics and the sub-tropics (Schultze-Kraft et al., 1997): grazing, cut-and-carry, hay and silage. Moreover, they can have direct and indirect effects in increasing resource and land use efficiency (Humphreys, 1994; Somé et al., 2006). Indeed most forages, in particular legumes, are also multi-purpose plants. When integrated in the rotation, direct effects on crop production include plant-water availability, weed suppression, pest and disease reduction and improved fallows (Cullen et al., 2006; Mapiye et al., 2007). Cultivated forages are also of better-feed quality for ruminants compared to weed fallow and the possibility to maintain animals on the farm improves soil fertility through manure production.
5For the Borgou and the Sudanian region of Africa in general, scientific results and knowledge on well-adapted forage species or cultivars are very limited today. Therefore, this paper reviews the forages that could be used for ley pastures in these regions, with a special focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the species in terms of ecology forage production, nutritive value and soil fertility management.
6The Borgou is located in Benin between 8°45'-12°30'N and 2°-3°15'E with an altitude varying from 200 to 300 m asl. The region covers about 52,093 km2 (46% of the country) with a population evaluated to 1,052,600 hbts in 1999 and an annual increasing rate of 3% (CARDER, 2005). The region can be divided from North to South into three ecological zones that are related to mean annual rainfall: Sudano-Sahelian, Sudanian and Sudano-Guinean zones. From the Northern Sudano-Sahelian zone to the Southern Sudano-Guinean, annual rainfalls increase from 900 to 1,200 mm (Figure 1). The rainy season lengthens from 5 to 7 months (April-October) and July-September is generally the wettest period of the year (Figure 2). Annual rainy days average 65 days with high variations from year to year. Within these above mean rainy conditions, local variations in ecosystems exist depending on soil and relief conditions (CARDER, 2005). The monthly and annual mean temperatures are between 21-34°C and 27-28°C, respectively. Monthly relative humidity and evaporation are between 40-90% and 3-6 mm per day respectively. Annual solar radiation average is slightly above 2,500 hours.
7A marking characteristic of the climate in Borgou is the temporal variability of annual rainfalls, with a general trend to lower rainfall and an increased mean temperature since the past decades (Figures 3 and 4). Some years have a total rainfall that significantly exceeds the long-term average, whereas others are far below. Years of abundant rainfall are generally followed by years of drought. These meteorological changes in the Borgou region agree with the trend observed in whole West Africa reported by Sultan et al. (2004) and Bigot et al. (2005). Such climatic changes have certainly an impact on the environment and the livelihoods of people through the plant growth and dry matter production and changes in land-use patterns (Russell, 1991).
8The region is characterized by ferruginous tropical soils (87%), ferralitic soils (10%) and vertisols (3%). According to FAO (1965) and CPCS (1967) soil classification, ferruginous tropical soils in Borgou are skeletal chromic-luvisoil or tropical concretionary ferruginised soil (Youssouf et al., 2002). Most lands have a slope varying from 1 to 10%, sometimes with a slightly undulating topography and granite or gneiss as parent material. Soil texture consists of friable gravely sand to gravely sand-loam and is highly leached in most of the region. Their deepness is highly variable (0.40-2 m) with reddish colour more pronounced in some sites and they increase in ferruginous gravel content with deep. Soils have a low water-holding capacity and are generally medium to well drained. The reaction is slightly acid to neutral (pHwater 6.0-6.7) in the surface layers (0-20 cm), decreasing slightly to acid in the lower layers. The chemical composition of these substrates shows an accumulation of ferric oxides and hydrates with low concentrations of aluminium oxide and low exchangeable cations capacity (2-5 cmol+ per 100 g), but with high base saturation (80-95%). Organic matter content is very low (0.5-1.5%) and soils are deficient in N (0.01-0.03%) and assimilable P (1-3 ppm Bray) (Youssouf et al., 2002).
9The natural vegetation in Borgou changes with the rainfall from wooded savannahs in the South to semi-desert steppes in the North. Some bush lands are also confined to rocky soils. Grasslands are dominated by Loxodera ledermannii (Pilg.) Clayton ex Laurent, Andropogon and Brachiaria species. Other species such as Setaria pallide-fusca (Schumach.) Stapf. and C.E.Hubb., Aristida adscensionis L., Aristida hordeacea Kunth, Axonopus compressus (Sw.) P.Beauv., Axonopus flexuosus (Peter) C.E.Hubb. ex Troupin are widespread (Sinsin et al., 1989). All the natural forests in Borgou have been destroyed by fire or cultivation. In the grasslands, woody species (Adansonia digitata L., Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R.Br. ex G.Don, Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertn., Mangifera indica L., etc.) are highly valued by the farmers because of the various products they benefit from: fruits, vegetable, cooking oil, firewood, spices, medicines, etc. (Adjanohoun et al., 1989; Sinsin et al., 1989; Bosch et al., 2002) and their positive influence on soil fertility maintenance (Traoré et al., 2004).
10The cattle breeds present in Borgou are called the Borgou cattle, a crossing between zebu (Bos indicus L.) and taurine (Bos taurus L.). They can withstand heat, are medium trypano-tolerant, they tolerate humidity and graze year round on hard feed conditions. Borgou cattle are also good draught animals given their small size. About 960,000 heads are present in the Borgou. It represents 70% of the stock in Benin (CARDER, 2005). Domestic sheep (Ovis aries L.) belong to Dwarf type of West Africa. With an estimated total of some 300,000 units in the region, sheep slightly outnumber goats (Capra hircus L.) (CARDER, 2005). Both have low reproduction ratio and productivity (CARDER, 2005).
11In Borgou, different livestock production systems coexist: transhumant herders, sedentary agropastoralists and farmers using animal power. However, since the majority of the herd is held in the transhumant system, there is a real lack of integration with the cropping systems.
12Most land in Borgou belong to a family clan or a village community (95%) and is transmitted through generations (CARDER, 2005). Family size varies between 5 and 10 persons exploiting 5-10 ha. Agriculture is dominated by cereals, yam (Dioscorea batatas Decné.), cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and few tree crop productions. Maize, sorghum, pearl millet, groundnut and cowpea are other important grain crops. Typically, the cultivated land is constituted of 1.5-2 ha of maize in association with or without cassava, 1-1.5 ha sorghum and millet, 1 ha yam and 1 ha for cash crop, cotton or groundnut. Rice is cultivated on limited areas corresponding to hydromorphic soils. Pepper, tomato and bitter-leaf are generally grown around the houses. Clearing starts around January and February and tilling is done between March and April. Planting starts with the rains, between April and May, but installation of some later varieties of yam might take place already in December. Harvesting happens between August and December. The same area is cropped for 3 to 4 years, alternately with a weed fallow of 2 to 3 years to recover fertility. However, due mainly to population growth and the development of cash crops (cotton and groundnut), cultivation periods are more and more prolonged and fallow periods shortened, leading to a decrease in soil fertility.
13The role of temporary pastures to improve soil fertility, increase land-use efficiency and produce synergistic effects in agricultural systems is highly documented (Buldgen et al., 1997; Muyekho et al., 2003; Mapiye et al., 2007). The main prerequisite to obtain efficient forages is however to choose the appropriate species and cultivars, for which the following basic aptitudes are requested:
14– the adaptability to the local environmental conditions, mainly climate and soils,
15– the capability to ensure high yields in palatable materials with acceptable nutritive value,
16– the maximum efficiency in soil fertility improvement.
17The choice of possible species of forages was first done by consulting the Tropical Forages Database version 1.1 (Cook et al., 2005), which offers an interactive tool to identify adapted species in specific environments. The main environmental conditions taken into account in this database are: altitude, temperature and rainfall ranges, length of dry season, preferences for substrate structure and texture, requirements for soil ecology such as acidity, Al saturation, drainage, flooding or waterlogging and salinity tolerance and the adaptation of the species to low soil fertility level. The selection was thereafter refined by using our own observations about species behaviour in savannah regions of West Africa, the opinion of crop-livestock producers and other useful information given by the scientific literature. For the forage grasses and legumes presented in tables 1 and 2, the following attributes were especially targeted: the survival of the species and the yields with minimum 1,000 mm of annual rainfall, the aptitude for soil fertility improvement, the requirements in fertilisation, the palatibility and the feeding value and, finally, the availability of seeds or planting material.
18Grasses. All grasses presented in table 1 are perennial with erect or creeping growth habit. They can grow in sandy soils, since they are adapted to a wide range of textures: gravel, sand or clay, provided that the soils are medium to well drained and not flooded or waterlogged for a long period (Bodgan, 1977; Rao et al., 1996; Cook et al., 2005). They are all adapted to tropical regions with a maximal altitude of 1,000 m asl and an average annual temperature varying from 20 to 30°C (Cook et al., 2005). They require generally mean annual rainfalls between 800 and 1,000 mm. However, drought tolerance varies widely between species and accessions. Panicum maximum Jacq. C1 and Andropogon gayanus Kunth are without any doubt the best adapted grasses to the drought years (600-700 mm) occurring in the Borgou (Messager, 1984; Buldgen et al., 1997; Geerts et al., 1998; Cook et al., 2005). On the contrary, Brachiaria ruziziensis R.Germ. & C.M.Evrard is a shallow rooted species and needs high soil water holding capacity due to the dry season length in Borgou. Its suitability seems therefore limited to deep soils.
19Differences in low soil fertility tolerance are also observed between species and accessions. Pennisetum purpureum Schum. and B. ruziziensis are generally weak for that point of view and particularly demanding for water, N, P and K. For example, the available P levels in the substrate must be maintained above 8 ppm for P. purpureum (Falade, 1975; Cook et al., 2005). In Borgou, P content of the soils ranges between 1 and 3 ppm (Youssouf et al., 2002). On the opposite, A. gayanus accessions are particularly adapted to low soil fertility and seasonal fires as observed in the West-African savannahs (CIAT, 1978).
20Legumes. The legumes selected in this review (Table 2) are adapted to a wide range of ecological situations (Bodgan, 1977; Cook et al., 2005). They grow in soils from sandy to clay, although they prefer generally a medium soil texture. Most species are successfully planted in situations receiving ideally from 1,000 to 1,500 mm. Some species, such as Stylosanthes fruticosa (Retz.) Alston, can however survive on field in very low rainfall areas (300 mm per year), with a pronounced dry season up to 6 months (Cook et al., 2005). The ideal average annual temperature of the selected legumes ranges from 20 to 30°C but selected shrub species, particularly Cajanus cajan (L.) Huth, are very heat-tolerant. C. cajan prefers hot moist conditions, such as those prevailing in Borgou, and grows at temperatures above 35°C under adequate soil conditions (Cook et al., 2005). All the selected legumes request medium substrate fertility. However, some accessions of Stylosanthes or Centrosema genus can grow in low soil fertility (Stace et al., 1984; Omokanye, 2001). Conversely, Macroptilium atropurpureum (DC.) Urb. requires P fertilisation if soils P contents are less than 8 ppm (Cook et al., 2005).
21Grasses. Forage dry matter (DM) production is highly variable depending on species, accessions and growing conditions, particularly when N fertilisers are applied. Commonly and under extensive cultivation, DM of 3-10 t.ha-1 can be achieved for Panicum, Andropogon, Brachiaria and Pennisetum accessions in typical West-African environments (Buldgen et al., 1997; Buldgen et al., 2001; Cook et al., 2005). All accessions of the selected species require high N fertiliser levels (up to 100-400 kg.ha-1) to reach dry matter yields up to 25-40 t.ha-1 DM and to persist under frequent cutting or grazing (Cook et al., 2005). When highly fertilised, DM production of A. gayanus and P. maximum C1 can reach up to 30 and 50 t.ha-1 DM, respectively (Roberge et al., 1999; Cook et al., 2005). P. purpureum is one of the most productive grass crop in the world and DM yields of 10-30 t.ha-1 DM per year are common. For this species to 85 t.ha-1 per year DM can be achieved under heavy fertilisation (Adegbola, 1964; Walmsley et al., 1978). Nevertheless, DM yield declines rapidly if fertility is not maintained. Generally, except for P. purpureum, the selected grasses must be cut or grazed at 3-4 weeks intervals and 15-20 cm height to obtain a best balance between persistency on field and feed quality and quantity. To maximize the leafy material, P. purpureum should not be allowed to grow more than 1.5 m before cutting at 30-40 cm above ground (Cook et al., 2005).
22The digestibility of the selected grasses are in the range of tropical pasture (50-80%) and the ingestion varies between 30 and 70 g.kg-0.75 (Babatoundé, 2005; Alkoiret, 2007). They support animal productions of 100 to 500 kg per ha per year and up to 800 or even 1,000 kg.ha-1 when high N is applied or when the grasses are mixed with legumes and exploited with moderate stocking rate (Toléba, 2001; Sidi-Imorou, 2002; Cook et al., 2005). On average, the nutritive value of B. ruziziensis is higher compared to the other selected grasses, but one must mention the risks for photosensitization and goitre when B. ruziziensis is fed alone to ruminants (Hare et al., 1997).
23Legumes. Annual yields of the selected legumes range from 2 to 6 t.ha-1 DM (Table 2). Under ideal conditions, Aeschynomene histrix Poir. and Centrosema pubescens Benth. yield more than 17 t.ha-1 DM in pure stands, but their contribution corresponds to 3 to 5 t.ha-1 DM in mixed pastures (Cook et al., 2005). If cutting is practised as frequently as for grasses, the main problem with herbaceous legumes lies in the reduction of regrowths and of seed production, decreasing finally the capacity of the pasture to persist, even under a vegetative form (Olanite et al., 2004). Legumes trees are generally more productive than herbaceous legumes. As an example, Jones et al. (1982) report 25 t.ha-1 DM for C. cajan.
24The palatability of the selected legumes strongly differs between the species. Cook et al. (2005) report that some legumes such as Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit are eaten the yearlong. Conversely, others such as C. cajan present a seasonal palatability and are readily eaten after flowering. M. atropurpureum has also a low palatability and needs some adaptation before acceptance by animals. S. fruticosa is reported to have high DM digestibility and voluntary intakes, 66% and 71 g.kg-0.75, respectively, indicating that the species could have reasonable potential for livestock production (Cook et al., 2005). The main weakness of Stylosanthes hamata (L.) Taub. and Stylosanthes guianensis (Aublet) Sw. lies in their sensitiveness to anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) (Edye et al., 1997; Hall et al., 2004).
25The tannin content of the selected legumes is generally low. Nevertheless, some species contain antinutritive and toxic compounds. This is for example the case for Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. that must be limited in the diet as seeds contain L-Dopa (D'Mello, 1995). L. leucocephala is highly nutritive for all livestock species (ruminants, pigs and chickens) (McNeill et al., 1998). However, its mimosine content has an antimitotic and depilatory effect on all animals when fed at high levels (Hegarty et al., 1976; Jones, 1979a; 1986). Low cost techniques exist for ruminants to overcome this constraint by introducing mimosine-degrading bacteria in the rumen once during the live of the animals (Jones, 1986).
26Grasses. Except for A. gayanus, results of the positive role of tropical or subtropical grasses alone (without legumes) on soil fertility are scarce. In mixture with legumes, some grasses have however shown a faculty in soil fertility restoration. Compared to natural fallow, Klein et al. (1999) reported an increase from 0.7 to 1% of the organic matter content of the soil, 0.38 to 0.58% for N, 1.8 to 2.4 units of exchangeable cations and 2 to 2.5% of CEC under pasture of P. maximum and S. hamata mixture grazed during 10 years. When ploughed for later grain crop, this ley pasture mixture yielded 75% crop grain more than after natural fallow. A. gayanus is also used as an indicator of good soil fertility by rural people (Saïdou, 2006; Somé et al., 2006) and shows good potential for the rehabilitation of degraded pastures in many tropical areas, without weed control or fertilisation (Mitja et al., 1998; Mullen et al., 2005; Bilgo et al., 2007). When incorporated into the rotation, Buldgen et al. (1997) observed that, beside a positive influence on fertility, A. gayanus also decreased soil erosion. These findings were confirmed by Somé et al. (2006; 2007) who recorded a significant effect of a 3-year A. gayanus ley pasture on soil carbon content and yields of subsequent crops.
27Legumes. Many experiences were conducted with legumes to improve soil fertility. Cereal crops in rotation with herbaceous legumes yield higher net returns than those gained from cereal-production practices based on commercial fertilizers (Mohamed-Saleem, 1986; Tarawali et al., 1995; Muhr, 1998; Muhr et al., 2002). A. histrix is recognized as improving fallow systems in West Africa (Becker et al., 1998). Some of its accessions also act as a trap crop for the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica Benth. (Weber et al., 1995).
28Many authors (Mohamed-Saleem, 1986; Bayer et al., 1989; Becker et al., 1998) showed also that Stylosanthes fallows improve yields of subsequent cereal crops between 50 and 100%, due sometimes to more than 100 kg.ha-1 N fixed annually (Vallis et al., 1984; Sanginga et al., 1996). Three years S. hamata fallow in Nigeria produced a total N accumulation of 91 kg N.ha-1 with 60-70% being derived from N fixation (Tarawali et al., 1995; Becker et al., 1998). Other legumes such as C. pubescens, M. pruriens and M. atropurpureum have been successfully tested in Sub-Saharan Africa with a valuable contribution as forage legume to soil structural stability, microbial activity and fertility (Sanginga et al., 1996).
29For tree legumes, a significant increase in soil cation capacity exchange (ranging from 6 to 12 cmol+.kg-1 dry soil) has been reported (Gichuru et al., 1989). C. cajan and L. leucocephala are excellent green manure for improving soil structure and quality and C. cajan has a useful fertiliser value, greater than natural regeneration or bush fallow (Dennison, 1959). One year of C. cajan growth increased the maize yield by a similar amount compared to high level of fertilisers (125 kg N, 30 kg P and 30 kg K.ha-1) (Shehu et al., 1997). Grain yields can be doubled after 2-3 years of L. leucocephala ley pastures (Mullen et al., 2005; Piggin et al., 2005).
30Grasses. In the Borgou region, all grass species presented in table 1 could be established by seed with sowing rates varying between 3 and 10 kg.ha-1 depending on seed quality and purpose of the pasture. Sowing must take place at the beginning of the rainy season and seed should be sown in hole at no more than 1-2 cm deep or broadcast on a well prepared seedbed and lightly covered (Cook et al., 2005). Except for A. gayanus, the grasses can also be established successfully by rooted tillers, particularly P. maximum species, with high success. Sowing density for selected grasses can be 50 cm to 60 cm in and between rows, or as close as 40 cm × 40 cm if a faster cover is required (Bogdan, 1977; Cook et al., 2005). P. purpureum can be established from seed although it is generally planted from cuttings about 20-30 cm length at 1 m × 1 m inter- and within-rows spacing.
31The selected grasses have different flowering behaviour, but they are all sensitive to short-days. Seed yields depend on accessions and plant management, particularly N and P applications (Noirot et al., 1986; Cook et al., 2005). For P. maximum the low germination rates, from 10 to 40%, is however a major limitation (Mandret et al., 1999). A. gayanus and Brachiaria spp. are high seed producers but their seed dormancy must be overcome through at least 6 months conservation (Grof, 1968; Miles et al., 1996; Cook et al., 2005). These grasses produce however a high soil-seed reserve with good potentiality for natural vegetation improvement.
32The selected grasses can also be cut-and-carried or grazed. However, B. ruziziensis is less tolerant to frequent cutting compared to P. maximum, A. gayanus and P. purpureum and may therefore not be suited for ley pasture if high productivity is required. Grasses can also be conserved successfully as hay for the dry season (Roberge et al., 1999) excepted for B. ruziziensis. Some accessions of P. maximum such as ' Mombaça ', ' Tanzania ' and ' C1 ' produce silage of good quality and can withstand heavy grazing. A. gayanus resists to fire much more than the other grasses, especially B. ruziziensis. After fire, it develops rapidly new tillers or seedlings (Jones, 1979b). Its thick stems are widely used as thatch in rural Africa.
33Stylosanthes, Centrosema, Aeschynomene and Macroptilium species have also been grown successfully in association with the selected grasses. Some shade tolerant grasses such as P. maximum cv. ' C1 ' can also be mixed with selected ligneous legumes like C. cajan or L. leucocephala (Bodgan, 1977; Jones, 1979a).
34Legumes. Most of legumes are short-day flowering and can be used for grazing or cutting during some months before seed production phase occurs from September to November. Herbaceous legumes can also contribute to soil protection. Early in the growing season, they are generally not palatable and stocking rate should be adjusted to control associated grasses if they appear to be too competitive. A. histrix, S. fruticosa, C. pubescens and M. pruriens. show high coverage. In a cropping system with maize, Mucuna plays also an important role in soil protection against erosion and weed control (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch.) (Sanginga et al., 1996; Buckles et al., 1998). Its weakness lies in the fact that it dies during the dry season. However, it can self-resow each year if exploitation is stopped once the plants start to flower. A. histrix is suited to a short-term fallow. It remains in the field throughout the years but is easily removed by ploughing. Conversely, because of its ligneous roots, L. leucocephala is not easy to eradicate and requires to be slashed-and-burned. It however allows wood yield of 10-40 t.ha-1 DM (Gichuru et al., 1989).
35The integration of forage agricultural systems in savannah regions of West Africa is a means to increase sustainability of animal and crop production, but it involves the adoption of new crops by smallholders. The possibility for forages to be installed during cultural calendar, the household resources, seed availability for pasture establishment and farmer's perception for each forage are important factors that must be taken into consideration in practice.
36Based on this review, when introducing a new forage resource, attention must be paid, especially in the Borgou region, on the dry years, with only 600 to 700 mm annual rainfalls. Under such situations, P. maximum cv. ' C1 ', some strains of A. gayanus or annual (S. fructicosa and S. hamata) and ligneous legumes (L. leucocephala) seem the most adapted solutions. The low financial capacity of many farmers also limits the possibility to introduce soil-fertility demanding plants such as P. purpureum or B. ruziziensis.
37Finally, considering advantages and disadvantages of the proposed forage species, the climatic change in West Africa, the opinion of the smallholders and the need of soil fertility improvement in extensive agricultural systems, a mixture of well-adapted grass and legume forages will probably lead to an optimal solution.
Adegbola A.A., 1964. Forage crop research and development in Nigeria. Niger. Agric. J., 1, 34-39.
Adjanohoun E.J. et al., 1989. Contribution aux études ethnobotaniques et floristiques en République Populaire du Bénin. Médecine traditionnelle et pharmacopée. Paris : Agence de Coopération Culturelle et Technique (ACCT).
Adjei M.B. & Fianu F.K., 1985. The effect of cutting interval on the yield and nutritive value of some tropical legumes on the coastal grassland of Ghana. Trop. Grassl., 19, 164-171.
Alkoiret T.I., Soule Manne A.A., Gbangboché A.B. & Attakpa E.Y., 2007. Performances d'embouche des ovins Djallonké complémentés avec les coques de graines de coton au Bénin. Livest. Res. Rur. Dev., 19(10), http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd19/10/alko19141.htm, (15/02/08).
Anoka U.A., Akobundu I.O. & Okonkwo S.N.C., 1991. Effects of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud and Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit on growth and development of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel. Agroforestry Syst., 16, 1-12.
Atta-Krah A.K., 1987. Flowering and seed production of Gliricidia sepium. In: Withington D., Glover N. & Brewbaker J.L., eds. Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp.: management and improvement. Waimanalo, HI, USA: NFTA (Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association) Special Publication 87-01, 45-50.
Babatoundé S., 2005. Etude et prédiction de la valeur alimentaire de graminées et de légumineuses fourragères en zone tropicale humide du Bénin. Thèse de doctorat : Faculté universitaire des Sciences agronomiques de Gembloux (Belgique).
Barnes P. & Addo-kwafo A., 1996. Evaluation of introduced forage accessions for fodder production at a subhumid site in southern Ghana. Trop. Grassl., 30, 422-425.
Bayer W. & Waters-Bayer A., 1989. Adapting tropical pasture research to the production system: from Australian ranching to African pastoralism. Exp. Agric., 25, 277-289.
Becker M. & Johnson D.E., 1998. Legumes as dry season fallow in upland rice-based systems of West Africa. Biol. Fert. Soils, 27, 358-367.
Bielig L.M., 1997. Chromosome numbers in the forage legume genus, Aeschynomene L. Sabrao J., 29, 33-39.
Bigot S. et al., 2005. Facteurs de la variabilité pluviométrique en Côte d'Ivoire et relations avec certaines modifications environnementales. Sécheresse, 16, 5-13.
Bilgo A. et al., 2007. Chemical and microbial properties of semi-arid tropical soils of short-term fallows in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Biol. Fert. Soils, 43, 313-320.
Bishop H.G., 1992. Aeschynomene americana L. In: 't Mannetje L. & Jones R.M., eds. Plant Resources of South-East Asia. No4. Forages. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc Scientific Publishers.
Bishop H.G., Ludke D.H. & Rutherford M.T., 1985. Glenn jointvetch: a new pasture legume for Queensland coastal areas. Queensland Agric. J., 111, 241-245.
Bishop H.G., Pengelly B.C. & Ludke D.H., 1988. Classification and description of a collection of the legume genus, Aeschynomene. Trop. Grassl., 22, 160-175.
Bogdan A.V., 1977. Tropical pastures and fodder plants (grasses and legumes). London; New York, USA: Longman.
Bosch C.H., Siemonsma J.S., Lemmens R.H. & Oyen L.P., eds, 2002. Plant resources of tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l'Afrique tropicale. Basic list of species and commodity grouping/Liste de base des espèces et de leurs groupes d'usage. Wageningen, The Netherlands: PROTA Programme.
Bowden B.N., 1963. Studies on Andropogon gayanus Kunth. 1. The use of Andropogon gayanus in agriculture. Emp. J. Exp. Agric., 31, 267-273.
Bray R.A., Tatang I.B. & Schlink A.C., 1993. Yield and quality of Gliricidia sepium accessions at two sites in the tropics. Trop. Grassl., 27, 30-36.
Bray R.A. & Woodroffe T.D., 1994. Macroptilium atropurpureum (DC.) Urban (atro) cv. ' Aztec '. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 34, 121.
Buckles D., Triomphe B. & Sain G., 1998. Cover crops in hillside agriculture. Farmer innovation with Mucuna. Ottawa: IDRC and CIMMYT.
Buldgen A. & Dieng A., eds., 1997. Andropogon gayanus var. ' bisquamulatus '. Une culture fourragère pour les régions tropicales. Gembloux, Belgique: Les Presses agronomiques de Gembloux.
Buldgen A. et al., 2001. Production and nutritive value of grasses cultivated in coastal area of Benin. Trop. Grassl., 35, 43-47.
Cameron D.G., 1985. Tropical and subtropical legumes. 5. Siratro pasture (Macroptilium atropurpureum): the most widely planted subtropical legume. Queensland Agric. J., 111, 45-49.
Capo-Chichi L.J., Weaver D.B. & Morton C.M., 2001. AFLP assessment of genetic variability among velvet bean (Mucuna sp.) accessions. Theor. Appl. Genet., 103, 1180-1188.
CARDER (Centre d'Action Régionale de Développement Rural-Borgou), 2005. Rapport annuel d'activité. Borgou, Bénin : CARDER.
Carr P.M., Poland W.W. & Tisor L.J., 2005. Natural reseeding by forage legumes following wheat in western North Dakota. Agron. J., 97, 1270-1277.
Carsky R.J. et al., 1998. Mucuna: herbaceous cover legume with potential for multiple uses. Resource and crop management research monograph. 25. Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).
C.P.C.S. (Commission de Pédologie et Cartographie des Sols), 1967. Classification française des sols. Travaux C.P.C.S. Grignon, France: ENSA.
CIAT, 1978, 1979, 1990, 1992, 2000, 2001. Annual reports 1978; 1979; 1990; 1992; 2000; 2001. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.
Clem R.L., 2004. Animal production from legume-based ley pastures in southeastern Queensland. In: Whitbread A.M. & Pengelly B.C., eds. Tropical legumes for sustainable farming systems in Southern Africa and Australia. Proceedings no 115. Canberra: ACIAR, 136-144.
Cobbina J. & Atta-Krah A.N., 1992. Gliricidia sepium accessions on a tropical alfisol in Nigeria. Trop. Grassl., 26, 248-254.
Cook B.G. et al., 2005. The production of tropical forages: an alternative selection tool. Http://www.tropicalforages.info, (15/02/08).
Cullen B.R. & Hill J.O., 2006. A survey of the use of lucerne, butterfly pea and lablab in ley pastures in the mixed-farming systems of northern Australia. Trop. Grassl., 40, 24-32.
D'Mello J.P.F., 1995. Anti-nutritional substances in legume seeds. In: D'Mello J.P.F. & Devendra C., eds. Tropical legumes in animal nutrition. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 135-172.
Dalal R.C. & Mayer R.J., 1986. Long-term trends in fertility of soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland. 1. Overall changes in soil properties and trends in winter cereal yields. Aust. J. Soil Res., 24, 265-279.
Dalal R.C., Strong W.M., Weston E.J. & Gaffney J., 1991. Sustaining multiple production systems. 2. Soil fertility decline and restoration of cropping lands in sub-tropical Queensland. Trop. Grassl., 25, 173-180.
Dennison E.B., 1959. The maintenance of soil fertility in the southern Guinea Savanna zone of southern Nigeria. Trop. Agric., 36, 330-336.
Dommergues Y., Duhoux E. & Diem H.G., 1999. Les arbres fixateurs d'azote. Montpellier, France : Editions Espaces 34.
Dzowela B.H., Wandera P.F., Were J. & Mohammed-Saleem M.A., 1998. Leucaena in smallholder farming in Africa: challenge for development. In: Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam, 9-14 February, 311-318.
Edye L.A. & Maass B.L., 1997. Recent advances in studies of anthracnose of Stylosanthes. I. The biogeography of Stylosanthes hamata, Stylosanthes scabra and Stylosanthes seabrana. Trop. Grassl., 31, 417-423.
Eilittä M. et al., 2003. Increasing Mucuna's potential as a food and feed crop. Proceedings of an international workshop held September 23-26, 2002, in Mombasa, Kenya. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystem, 1(special issue), 1-343, http://www.uady.mx/sitios/veterina/servicios/journal/2002-2-3/indice-1(2-3).html, (20/01/08).
Ella A., Jacobsen C., Stür W.W. & Blair G., 1989. Effect of plant density and cutting frequency on the productivity of four tree legumes. Trop. Grassl., 23, 28-34.
English B.H., 1999. Macroptilium atropurpureum in Australia. In: Loch D.S. & Ferguson J.E., eds. Forage seed production. 2: Tropical and subtropical species. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 407-412.
Falade J.A., 1975. The effect of phosphorus on the growth and mineral composition of five tropical grasses. East Afr. Agric. For. J., 40, 342-350.
Fantz P.R., 1996. Taxonomic notes on the Centrosema pubescens Bentham complex in Central America (Leguminosae: Phaseoleae: Clitoriinae). Sida, 17, 321-332.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation), 1965. Guidelines for soil description. Paris: FAO Flat.
Floret C. & Pontannier R., 1999. La jachère en Afrique tropicale. 1 : Les actes du congrès. Rôles, aménagement, alternatives. In : Actes du séminaire international, Dakar, Sénégal, avril 1999.
Gbangboché A.B., 2005. Performances zootechniques et paramètres génétiques des ovins Djallonké au Bénin. Thèse de doctorat : Université de Liège (Belgique).
Geerts P., Buldgen A., Diallo T. & Dieng A., 1998. Drought resistance by six Senegalese local strains of Andropogon gayanus var. ' biscumulatus ' through osmoregulation. Trop. Grassl., 32, 235-242.
Gichuru M.P. & Kang B.T., 1989. Calliandra calothyrsus (Meissn.) in an alley cropping system with sequentially cropped maize and cowpea in southwestern Nigeria. Agroforestry Syst., 9, 191-203.
Gillett J.B., Polhill B.A. & Verdcourt B., 1971. Leguminosae, Papilionoideae. In: Milne-Redhead E. & Polhill R.M., eds. Flora of tropical East Africa. London: Crown agents for overseas governments and administrations.
Gobius N.R. et al., 2001. Seed yield and its components of Brachiaria decumbens cv. ' Basilis ', Digitaria milanjiana cv. ' Jarra ' and Andropogon gayanus cv. ' Kent ' in north-east Thailand under different rates of nitrogen application. Trop. Grassl., 35, 26-33.
Grof B., 1968. Viability of seed of Brachiaria decumbens. Queensland J. Agric. Anim. Sci., 25, 149-152.
Haggar R.J., 1966. The production of seed from Andropogon gayanus. In: Proceedings of the International Seed Testing Association (I.S.T.A.), 31, 251-259.
Hakiza J.J., Lazier J.R. & Sayers A.R., 1987. Characterization and evaluation of forages legumes in Ethiopia: preliminary examination of variation between accessions of Stylosanthes fruticosa (Retz.) Alston. In: Dzowela B.H., ed. African forage plant genetic resources, evaluation of forage germplasm and extensive livestock production systems. Proceedings of the 3rd PANESA (Pasture Network for Eastern and Southern Africa) workshop held at Arusha, Tanzania, 27-30 April 1987, 174-191.
Hall T.J. & Glatzle A., 2004. Cattle production from Stylosanthes pastures. In: Chakraborty S., ed. High yielding anthracnose-resistant Stylosanthes for agricultural systems. Monograph no111. Canberra: ACIAR.
Hare M.D. & Phaikew C., 1997. Forage seed production in northeast Thailand. In: Loch D.S. & Ferguson J.E., eds. Forage seed production. 2: Tropical and subtropical species. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 435-443.
Hare M.D., Tatsapong P. & Saipraset K., 2007. Seed production of two brachiaria hybrid cultivars in northeast Thailand. 1. Method and time of planting. Trop. Grassl., 41, 26-34.
Häussler K., Rao I.M., Schultze-Kraft R. & Marschner H., 2006. Shoot and root growth of two tropical grasses, Brachiaria ruziziensis and Brachiaria dictyoneura, as influenced by aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in a sandy loam oxisol of the eastern plains of Colombia. Trop. Grassl., 40, 213-221.
Hegarty M.P., Court R.D., Christie G.S. & Lee C.D., 1976. Mimosine in Leucaena leucocephala is metabolised to a goitrogen in ruminants. Aust. Vet. J., 52, 490-495.
Hodges E.M. et al., 1982. Production and utilization of the tropical legume Aeschynomene (Aeschynomene americana L.). Circular S-290. Gainesville, FL., USA: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
Hopkinson J.M. et al., 1996. Reproductive physiology, seed production and seed quality of Brachiaria. In: Miles J.W., Maass B.L., Valle C.B. & do Kumble V., eds. Brachiaria: biology, agronomy, and improvement. Cali, Colombia: CIAT Publication no259, 124-140.
Humphreys L.R., 1994. Tropical forages: their role in sustainable agriculture. Essex, UK: Longman.
Jones R.J., 1979a. The value of Leucaena leucocephala as a feed for ruminants in the tropics. World Anim. Rev., 31, 13-23.
Jones C.A., 1979b. The potential of Andropogon gayanus Kunth in the oxisol and ultisol savannas of Tropical America. Herb. Abstr., 19, 1-8.
Jones R.J., 1986. Leucaena: international experience. Trop. Grassl., 20, 83-85.
Jones R.J. & Jones R.M., 1982. Observations on the persistence and potential for beef production of pastures based on Trifolium semipilosum and Leucaena leucocephala in sub-tropical coastal Queensland. Trop. Grassl., 16, 24-29.
Jones R.M. & Bunch G.A., 2003a. Experiences with farm pastures at the former CSIRO Samford Research Station, southeast Queensland, and how these relate to results from 40 years of research. Trop. Grassl., 37, 151-164.
Jones R.M. & Jones R.J., 2003b. Effect of stocking rates on animal gain, pasture yield and composition, and soil properties from setaria-nitrogen and setaria-legume pastures in coastal southeast Queensland. Trop. Grassl., 37, 65-83.
Kaminski P.E., Schifino-Wittmann M.T. & Paim N.R., 2005. Growth and survival of a range of Leucaena species in southern Brazil. Trop. Grassl., 39, 1-8.
Klein H.D. & César J., 1999. Plantes fourragères et fertilité du sol. In: Robertge G. & Toutain B. Cultures fourragères tropicales. Montpellier, France : CIRAD, 321-357.
Koutika L.S., Sanginga N., Vanlauwe B. & Weise S., 2002. Chemical properties of soil organic matter assessment under fallow systems in the forest margins benchmark. Soil Biol. Biochem., 34, 757-765.
Kretschmer A.E. & Bullock R.C., 1980. Aeschynomene spp.: distribution and potential use. In: Proceedings of the Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, 39, 145-152.
Lalljee B., Facknath S. & Osman A., 1998. Improvement of soil properties under long-term Leucaena leucocephala. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mulen B.F & Bray R.A., eds. Leucaena: adaptation, quality and farming systems. Proceedings no86. Canberra: ACIAR, 178-180.
Loch D.S. & Ferguson J.E., eds., 1999. Forage Seed Production. 2: Tropical and Subtropical Species. Oxon, UK: CAB International.
Mandret G. & Noirot M., 1999. Production de semences fourragères tropicales. In: Roberge G. & Toutain B., eds. Cultures fourragères tropicales. Montpellier, France : CIRAD, 189-213.
Mapiye C., Mwale M. & Mupangwa J.F., 2007. Utilization of ley legumes as livestock feed in Zimbabwé. Trop. Grassl., 41, 84-91.
Mapongmetsem P.M., Duguma B., Nkongmeneck B.A. & Selegny E., 1999. Germination des semences, développement et croissance de quelques essences locales en zone forestière. Tropicultura, 17, 175-179.
McIntire J., Bourzat D. & Pingali P., 1992. Crop livestock interaction in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
McKeon G.M. & Mott J.J., 1984. Seed biology of Stylosanthes. In: Stace H.M. & Edye L.A., eds. The biology and agronomy of Stylosanthes. North Ryde, Australia: Academic Press, 311-332.
McNeill D.M., Osborne N., Komolong M. & Nankervis D., 1998. Condensed tannins in the genus Leucaena and their nutritional significance for ruminants. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullin B.F. & Bray R.A., eds. Leucaena: adaptation, quality and farming systems. Proceedings no86. Canberra: ACIAR, 205-214.
Merkel U. et al., 2000. Characterization of a collection of Aeschynomene histrix in subhumid Nigeria. J. Agric. Sci., 134, 293-304.
Messager J.L., 1984. Notes sur les modalités techniques d'installation des pâturages de Panicum. Rev. Elev. Méd. Vét. Pays Trop., 37, 336-340.
Middleton C.H. & McCosker T.H., 1975. Makueni, a new guinea grass for North Queensland. Queensland Agric. J., 101, 351-355.
Miles J.W., Maass B.L., Valle C.B. & do Kumble V., eds., 1996. Brachiaria: biology, agronomy, and improvement. Cali, Colombia: CIAT Publication no259.
Mitja D., Leal N. & Topall O., 1998. Rehabilitation of degraded Amazon pastures. Cases of Andropogon gayanus Kunth (Maraba, Para, Brazil). Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie, 53, 39-57.
Miyagi E., 1980. The effect of planting density on yield of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach). Sci. Bul. Coll. Agric., 27, 293-301.
Mohamed-Saleem A.M., 1986. Integration of forage legumes into the cropping systems of Nigeria's sub-humid zone. In: Kaufmann V.R., Chater S. & Blench R., eds. Livestock systems research in Nigeria's sub-humid zone. Proceedings of the second ILCA/NAPRI Symposium held in Kaduna-Nigeria, 29 October-2 November 1984, Addis-Abeba, Ethiopia, 305-325.
Mugwe J.N., O'Neil M.K. & Mugendi N.D., 1998. Leuceuna leucocephala and Calliandra calothyrsus for soil productivity improvement in sub-humid Highlands of Kenya. In: Proceedings of a workshop held on February 9-14 in Hanoi, Vietnam, 181-184.
Muhr L., 1998. Potential of forage legumes on fallow land for enhanced forage production and soil fertility in crop-livestock farming systems of subhumid West Africa. Thesis: University Hohenheim (Germany).
Muhr L., Peters M., Tarawali S.A. & Schultze-Kraft R., 1999. Forage legumes for improved fallows in agropastoral systems of subhumid West Africa. III. Nutrient import and export by forage legumes and their rotational effects on subsequent maize. Trop. Grassl., 33, 245-256.
Muhr L., Tarawali S.A., Peters M. & Schultze-Kraft R., 2002. Soil mineral N dynamics and maize grain yields following Centrosema macrocarpum and Stylosanthes guianensis: effects of different rotations and varying levels of fertilizer. Field Crops Res., 78, 197-209.
Muia J.M.K., Tamminga S., Mbugua P.N. & Kariuki J.N., 1999. Optimal stage of maturity for feeding napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) to dairy cows in Kenya. Trop. Grassl., 33, 182-190.
Mullen B.F., Shelton H.M. & Dalzell S.A., 2005. Leucaena in northern Australia: a forage tree legume success story. Trop. Grassl., 39, 226.
Muyekho F.N., Mose L. & Cheruiyot D.T., 2003. Development and transfer of forage production technologies for smallholder dairying: case studies of participatory evaluation of species and methods of establishment in western Kenya. Trop. Grassl., 37, 251-256.
Nikiema A., 2005. Agroforestry parkland species diversity: uses and management in semi-arid west Africa (Burkina Faso). Thesis: Wageningen University (The Netherlands).
Noirot M. et al., 1986. La production grainière des nouvelles variétés de Panicum maximum sélectionnées en Côte d'Ivoire. Fourrages, 106, 11-18.
Nye P.H. & Greenland D.J., 1960. The soil under shifting cultivation. Technical communication no51. Harpenden, UK: Commonwealth Bureau of Soils; Farnham Royal, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
Olanite J.A., Tarawali S.A. & Akan'ova M.E., 2004. Biomass yield, quality and acceptability of selected grass-legume mixtures in the moist savanna of West Africa. Trop. Grassl., 38, 117-128.
Omokanye A.T., 2001. Forage yield and chemical composition of centro (Centrosema pubescens) in the year of establishment at Shika, Nigeria. Trop. Grassl., 36, 53-57.
Ong C.K. & Daniel J.N., 1990. Le pois d'Angole. Agroforesterie Aujourd'hui, 2, 4-7.
Peake D.C.I., Myers R.J.K. & Henzell E.F., 1990. Sown pasture production in relation to nitrogen fertiliser and rainfall in Southern Queensland. Trop. Grassl., 24, 291-298.
Pengelly B.C., Clem R.L. & Whitbread A.M., 2004. The role of Stylosanthes spp. in mixed crop-livestock systems in Africa and Australia. In: Chakraborty S., ed. High yielding anthracnose-resistant Stylosanthes for agricultural systems. Monograph no111. Canberra: ACIAR.
Peters M. et al., 2001. The role of forages in reducing poverty and degradation of natural resources in tropical production systems. Network paper n°117. London: Agricultural Research and Extension Network, http://www.odi.org.uk/agren/publist.html, (15/02/08).
Peters M. & Lascano C.E., 2003. Forage technology adoption: linking on-station research with participatory methods. Trop. Grassl., 37, 197-203.
Phaikaew C. & Pholsen P., 1993. Ruzi grass (Brachiaria ruziziensis) seed production and research in Thailand. In: Chen C.P. & Satjipanon C., eds. Strategies for suitable forage-based livestock production in Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the regional working group on grazing and feed resources of Southeast Asia, Department of Livestock Development, Bangkok, Thailand, 165-173.
Piggin C.M. & Nulik J., 2005. Leucaena: sustainable crop and livestock production systems in Nusa Tenggara Timur province, Indonesia. Trop. Grassl., 39, 218.
Rao I.M., Boddey R.M. & Thomas R.J., 1996. Nutrient cycling and environmental impact of brachiaria pastures. In: Miles J.W., Maass B.L., Valle C.B. & do Kumble V., eds. Brachiaria: biology, agronomy and improvement. Cali, Colombia: CIAT, 72-86.
Rethman N., 2000. Grass, grass-legume or legume leys: a south African experience. Trop. Grassl., 34, 177-180.
Roberge G. & Toutain B., 1999. Choix des plantes fourragères. In: Roberge G. & Toutain B., eds. Cultures fourragères tropicales. Montpellier, France : CIRAD, 147-184.
Rudd V.E., 1955. The American species of Aeschynomene. Contributions from the United States. Natl Herb., 32, 23-30.
Russell J.S., 1991. Likely climatic changes and their impact on the northern pastoral industry. Trop. Grassl., 25, 211-218.
Saïdou A., 2006. Converting strategies by farmers and scientists to improve soil fertility and enhance crop-production in Benin. Thesis: Wageningen University (The Netherlands).
Sanginga N. et al., 1996. Nodulation and estimation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation by herbaceous and shrub legumes in Guinea savanna in Nigeria. Biol. Fert. Soils, 23, 441-448.
Santos P.M., Corsi M., Pedreira C.G.S. & Lima C.G., 2006. Tiller cohort development and digestibility in Tanzania guinea grass (Panicum maximum cv. ' Tanzania ') under three levels of grazing intensity. Trop. Grassl., 40, 84-93.
Schultze-Kraft R. & Clements R.J., eds., 1990. Centrosema: biology, agronomy and utilization. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.
Schultze-Kraft R. & Peters M., 1997. Tropical legumes in agricultural production and resource management: an overview. Giessener Beitr. Entwicklungsforschung, 24, 1-17.
Shehu Y., Alhassan W.S. & Phillips C.J.C., 1997. The effect of intercropping maize with Stylosanthes hamata at different row spacings on grain and fodder yields and chemical composition. Trop. Grassl., 31, 227-231.
Sidi-Imorou H., 2002. Etude du comportement alimentaire des moutons Djallonké et de leurs performances à l'engraissement sur les cultures fourragères en mélange. Thèse de doctorat : Université d'Abomey-Calavi (Bénin).
Sinsin B., Oloulotan S. & Oumorou M., 1989. Les pâturages de saison sèche de la zone soudanienne du nord-est du Bénin. Rev. Elev. Méd. Vét. Pays Trop., 42, 283-288.
Skerman P.J., 1977. Tropical forage legumes. Roma: FAO.
Skerman P.J. et al., 1988. Tropical forage legumes. FAO plant production and protection series no2. Roma: FAO.
Somé N.A., Hien V. & Ouédraogo S.J., 2006. Amélioration du statut organique d'un sol ferrugineux tropical lessivé sous jachère artificielle à Andropogon spp. au Burkina Faso : effet des traitements sur la chimie du sol. Tropicultura, 24, 200-207.
Somé N.A., Traoré K., Traoré O. & Tassembedo M., 2007. Potentiel des jachères artificielles à Andropogon spp. dans l'amélioration des propriétés chimiques et biologiques des sols en zone soudanienne (Burkina Faso). Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 11, 245-252.
Stace H.M. & Edye L.A., eds., 1984. The biology and agronomy of Stylosanthes. North Ryde, Australia: Academic Press.
Sultan B. & Janicot S., 2004. La variation climatique en Afrique de l'Ouest aux échelles saisonnière et intra-saisonnière. 1. Mise en place de la mousson et variabilité intra-saisonnière de la convection. Sécheresse, 15, 321-330.
't Mannetje L., 1992. Pennisetum purpureum Schumach. In: 't Mannetje L. & Jones R.M., eds. Plant resources of Southeast Asia. 4: Forages. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc Scientific Publishers, 191-192.
Tarawali G. & Mohamed-Saleem M.A., 1995. The role of forage legume fallows in supplying improved feed and recycling nitrogen in subhumid Nigeria. In: Tarawali G. et al., eds. Livestock and sustainable nutrient cycling in mixed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa. 2: Technical papers. Proceedings, Addis-Abeba, Ethiopia, 22–26 November 1993, 263-276.
Toléba S.S. et al., 2001. Etude comparative de deux espèces fourragères (Panicum maximum local et Brachiaria ruziziensis) complémentées par des graines de coton sur les performances pondérales des ovins Djallonké. Ann. Sci. Agron. Bénin, 2, 193-208.
Toledo J.M., Vera R., Lascano C. & Lenne J.M., eds., 1990. Andropogon gayanus Kunth: a grass for tropical acid soils. Publication no90. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.
Traoré K., Ganry F., Olivier R. & Gigou J., 2004. Litter production and soil fertility in a Vitellaria paradoxa parkland in a catena in Southern Mali. Arid Land Res. Manage., 18, 359-368.
Tudsri S., Jorgensen S.T., Riddachi P. & Pookpakdi A., 2002. Effect of cutting height and dry season closing date on yield and quality of five napier grass cultivars in Thailand. Trop. Grassl., 36, 248-252.
Valarini M.J. & Possenti R.A., 2006. Research note: nutritive value of a range of tropical forage legumes. Trop. Grassl., 40, 183-187.
Vallis I. & Gardener C.J., 1984. Nitrogen inputs into agricultural systems by Stylosanthes. In: Stace H.M. & Edye L.A., eds. The biology and agronomy of Stylosanthes. North Ryde, Australia: Academic Press, 359-379.
Vandenbeldt J.R., 1988. Cajanus cajan: it's more than just a pulse. NFT Highlights, NFTA 88(6), 1-2.
Walmsley D., Sargeant V.A.L. & Dookeran M., 1978. Effect of fertilizers on growth and composition of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) in Tobago, West Indies. Trop. Agric., 25, 329-334.
Wandera F.P., Karachi M., Mangope S. & Lefofe B.M., 2005. Leucaena production in Botswana. Trop. Grassl., 39, 229.
Weber G. et al., 1995. Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. in the cropping systems of the Northern Guinea savanna. Resource and Crop Management Division. Vol. 19. Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).
Whitbread A.M., Jiri O. & Maasdorp B., 2004. The effect of managing improved fallows of Mucuna pruriens on maize production and soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in sub-humid Zimbabwe. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosystem, 69, 59-71.
Youssouf I. & Lawani M., 2002. Les sols béninois : classification dans la référence mondiale. In : Quatorzième réunion du sous-comité ouest et centre africain de corrélation des sols pour la mise en valeur des terres. 9-13 octobre 2000, Bénin, Abomey-Calavi. Rome : FAO.
Pour citer cet article
A propos de : Sébastien Adjolohoun
Université d'Abomey-Calavi. Faculté des Sciences agronomiques. Département des Productions animales. 01 BP 526 Cotonou (Benin).
A propos de : Jérôme Bindelle
Gembloux Agricultural University – FUSAGx. Animal Science Unit. Passage des Déportés, 2. B-5030 Gembloux (Belgium).
A propos de : Claude Adandédjan
Université d'Abomey-Calavi. Faculté des Sciences agronomiques. Département des Productions animales. 01 BP 526 Cotonou (Benin).
A propos de : André Buldgen
Gembloux Agricultural University – FUSAGx. Animal Science Unit. Passage des Déportés, 2. B-5030 Gembloux (Belgium). E-mail: email@example.com